Thursday, October 27, 2011

Annotated Bib - Employability of New Grad Rns


Employability has been operationalized by Harvey (2005). Though the author’s works applies to college graduates in general, the specific application to nursing graduates provides a framework for investigating recent trends of experienced difficulty acquiring first employment. Previous work experiences and external factors are two concepts that are often overlooked by crowded curriculum demands and other requirements. If explored thoroughly, these two concepts can create a holistic approach for educating students that will be sought after by recruiters and employers.

1. Aamodt, P., & Havnes, A. (2008). Factors Affecting Professional Job Mastery: Quality of Study or Work Experience?. Quality in Higher Education, 14(3), 233-248. doi:10.1080/13538320802507539
Faculty from the University of Bergen in Norway explored Harvey’s (2005) definition of employability within the context of the economic climate and hiring practices in their country. Their research links the concepts and principles identified by Harvey, but extended their importance beyond the curricular experience and well into the first years of professional employment post-graduation. Thus, employers should utilize the examples set forth in Burns & Poster (2008) to form collaboration with educational institutions. Likewise, nursing education programs may need to invite common employers as stakeholders to discuss employability concepts in the form of undergraduate nursing student employment and postgraduate shortened internships.

2. Burns, P., & Poster, E. C. (2008). Competency development in new registered nurse graduates: closing the gap between education and practice. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 39(2), 67-73.
The authors are each deans of nursing programs at universities in Texas. After an extensive literature review, a 2-day seminar was organized and solicited attendance from nursing faculty and nurse educators on both sides of the education/practice arena. A discussion on clinical competency of new graduates and how programs change to correct issues demonstrates an eminent need to track, or survey, graduates for continuing evaluation of success. Particularly, schools that implement suggested changes will need to create survey samples of those select students to provide validation for new innovations for developing clinical competence in students. Surveys of employers of graduates from these programs should indicate increased satisfaction of clinical competence. Thus, the employability of graduates from the employer perspective can be monitored and observed for trends.

3. Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education. (2009, April). Standards for accreditation of baccalaureate and graduate degree nursing programs. Retrieved October 23 2011, from American Association of Colleges of Nursing: http://www.aacn.nche.edu/accreditation/pdf/standards09.pdf
CCNE is a national accrediting agency that services a large majority of BSN and MSN programs across the United States. Approved by the US Department of Education, the CCNE effectively uses a multi-level collaboration process and current research to update standards for the accreditation process for nursing programs. The current version requires the analysis of aggregate alumni outcomes to serve as a key component of program evaluation. Such a requirement validates the immediate necessity to improve alumni participation and feedback after graduation to continually help measure employability based on undergraduate education.

4. Dalley, K., Candela, L., & Benzel-Lindley, J. (2008). Learning to let go: the challenge of de-crowding the curriculum. Nurse Education Today, 28(1), 62-69.
Nursing Faculty from two state universities in Nevada provide an in-depth literature review and subsequent analysis on recent development and practices in developing nursing curriculum. By presenting the learning centered model, nursing educators are encourage to “de-crowd” curriculum. This evidence of over crowded curriculum suggests that students are over burdened thus prohibiting availability to allow for part-time work while in undergraduate nursing education. Curriculum evaluation must also consider a possible approach of incorporating work experience, such as nurse externships, to promote employability.

5. Harvey, L. (2005). Embedding and integrating employability. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2005, 13-28. doi:10.1002/ir.160
The UK based author has produced multiple publications in his efforts to develop a theory for employability. As a researcher for Quality in Higher Education, Harvey’s work on employability stems the 1997 Dearing Report which identified a significant need in correcting a growing problem. Defined concepts, with supporting evidence, are targeted to both faculty and employers who recruit new graduates in almost in discipline requiring collegiate experience. Within the scope of nursing, Harvey’s theory can assist educators and recruiters to address the issues plaguing new graduates today as identified in the Nurse Executive Report (2005) and IOMs: Future of Nursing (2011).

6. Porter, S. R., Whitcomb, M. E., & Weitzer, W. H. (2004). Multiple Surveys of Students and Survey Fatigue. New Directions for Institutional Research, (121), 63-73.
The authors, all faculty at Wesleyan University in the UK, collected relevant literature to help guide research investigating paper vs. web surveys. These efforts add to a body of evidence that suggest survey administrators should be cautious when scheduling survey deployment. Exhaustive surveying during and immediately following nursing graduation may generate premature fatigue. To prevent this, a progressive and scheduled approach for collecting graduate data can maintain interest and achieve continual participation. Evaluating employability of nursing graduates is dependent on adequate response rates from alumni surveys.

7. Salamonson, Y., & Andrew, S. (2006). Academic performance in nursing students: influence of part-time employment, age and ethnicity. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 55(3), 342-349; discussion 350-351. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03863_1.x
Salamonson and Andrew are two well-published experts in nursing education and currently serve as faculty in Sydney, Australia. Their study of second year nursing students demonstrates to nursing program administrators the detrimental affect of working nursing students on academic performance. These negative findings must be considered when investigating the immediate and long term consequence of student employment and employability.

8. Schoofs, N., Bosold, S., Slot, V., & Flentje, J. (2008). Nursing Student Employment. Nurse Educator, 33, 57-58. doi:10.1097/01.NNE.0000299501.32529.44
Faculty from various universities in the Midwest US conducted a descriptive study from nursing students at their respective schools of nursing. Their study replicated the efforts of Salamonson & Andrew (2006) to investigate widely adopted opinion of discouraging part time work during undergraduate nursing education. However, these authors failed to find similar results from their sample as did Salamonson & Andrew. Though results were not significant, these faculty could have extended their research to determine if students who did work during undergraduate study demonstrated increased employability after graduation.

9. Story, L., Butts, J., Bishop, S., Green, L., Johnson, K., & Mattison, H. (2010). Innovative strategies for nursing education program evaluation. Journal of Nursing Education, 49(6), 351-354.
Nursing faculty at the University of Southern Mississippi conducted research on ways to increase participation in alumni and employer satisfaction surveys. After a history of dismal response rates, surveys were shortened, newer web technologies were utilized, and social media sites were encouraged for undergraduate student groups. Their example adds to a beginning body of evidence for nursing education programs looking for evidence-based practice to improve aspects of program evaluation. This is a growing problem as Porter, Whitcomb, & Weitzer (2004) highlights the rising concern of survey fatigue among alumni.

10. Volkwein, J. (2010). Assessing alumni outcomes. New Directions for Institutional Research, 125-139.
Volkwein, former director for the Center for the Study of Higher Education at Pennsylvania State University, has documented expertise in statistical methodologies, survey design, and organizational effectiveness. Challenges along with suggested solutions are presented along with resources for those interested in collecting alumni outcome data. Nursing programs, such as the one highlighted by Story et al. (2010) can use this information for successful planning and implementation of alumni surveys. More specifically, nursing schools can review Volkwein’s article for areas that they might be currently experiencing difficulty. If managed correctly, nursing programs can expect to collect a wealth of information in alumni studies that can highlight employability success after graduation.

No comments: